Are the declining fortunes of the Japanese comic industry threatening its once legendary diversity? That's what this article from Japanese economics website Tokyokeizai Online seems to suggest. In 1995, Weekly Jump, that cornerstone of otaku dreams, sold some six million copies every week. That number is down to 2.8 million today. And they aren't an exception: Jump is just one of many manga magazines struggling with slumping circulations and revenues.
The manga industry is structured such that weekly comic magazines are the "proving ground" for new content that are eventually collected into pocket-sized tankobon volumes. That's where the real money is made, especially when a series is turned into an animated show or film. Or at least it was. Nowadays, the hits sell like wildfire and the non-hits don't move at all, forcing editors to become far choosier about the content they select for publication.
"The industry is struggling; there's a sense that the marketable standout series have been exhausted," according to Masaharu Kubo of The Research Institute for Publications. "Now the market continues to polarize into series aimed purely at the mainstream, and series aimed purely at otaku." In other words, the niche stuff that makes the Japanese comic scene so great is becoming a much harder sell.
The situation has a trickle-down effect on those who actually create manga as well, of course. Generally speaking, a comic artist can't turn a profit based simply on the per-page rate they're paid for publishing their comics. Particularly interesting is the economic profile of artist Chin Nakamura, creator of the series "Gunjou." Although she is paid from 9,500 yen to 12,350 per page of work, crushing deadlines require her to hire numerous assistants, cutting deeply into her revenues and in some cases forcing her to borrow against her salary from the publisher.
Everyone agrees that the key to ensuring the industry's health is quality content. But the current system, which pretty much forces all published artists to take assistants to crank out huge volumes of content, is taking its toll on the creators. "If we don't take serious action," concludes Nakamura, "the system that allows so many quality manga to flourish will collapse." The article concludes that until the issue of the "working poor" artists is addressed, it will be all but impossible for the vast majority of manga artists to enjoy a decent standard of living -- but where will the money come from given the declining sales of comic magazines and books?
Sounds like the system is collapsing on itself. Will we see a breaking down, or minimizing of the industry, which will rejuvenate itself? Or will the manga industry forever change?
Posted by: tissuekins | November 13, 2009 at 12:55 AM
I hate to say it, but might it not be possible to use software to do more of the tasks that assistants do, thus allowing the creator to keep more of their money? It's true that assisting a pro is a traditional way to bring in new talent, but Japan has other options, including their strong doujinshi scene.
American comics creators sometimes scratch their head when they hear of the crew of assistants a manga artist uses--a U.S. comics artist is expected to create everything on a page themselves. Of course, the manga-ka, unlike the U.S. comics artist, is generally expected to write as well as draw, which is an additional responsibility.
I would imagine this crisis is most severe among the weekly and biweekly magazines, which are traditionally the best-selling (if they weren't, their publication schedule couldn't be supported). Monthlies are another matter. An artist who produces a monthly title is working at a pace comparable to an American creator--furthermore, in the American case, the story must usually be colored as well; the artist typically doesn't do this, but it is an additional step in the production that must be accounted for.
Posted by: Carl | November 13, 2009 at 06:40 AM
So comics artists in Japan can't make a decent living, either? Now I don't feel like such a loser. I thought it was just me.
-- Bruce Lewis (artist/writer, ROBOTECH INVID WAR AFTERMATH and many other fine comics)
Posted by: Bruce Lewis | November 13, 2009 at 02:21 PM
Sounds like the means of production adapted themselves to the revenue stream without planning for a change in that stream. My question is, what's changing the stream? Why are manga sales dropping? General economic malaise, or something else? Japan's economy has been in a slump for quite a while now; did some new factor strike? Could it be another effect of the aging population?
I for one don't want to see manga get clobbered, but speaking as a comic artist who has to work solo, I wouldn't mind seeing how well manga artists cope with limited resources.
Posted by: Tim Eldred | November 14, 2009 at 12:36 AM
I haven't seen any of the weeklys in some time, but I recall there was ALWAYS lots of interesting, different stories going on. Is it possible that like with anime, there's too much 'push' to find the NEXT BIG THING and not enough careful sowing and tending of 'steady' titles? Like assuming every batter can hit nothing but home runs and striking out while the other team just gets base hit after base hit and bringing runners home.
Since we're not getting stuff like Perfectual Earth Defense Force and Cyber Blue, I have no interest anymore.
Posted by: Steve Harrison | November 14, 2009 at 06:18 AM
Perhaps we could compare the assistant system, with famous manga-ka, to what happened with an author like Tom Clancy, where a best-selling creator expands into being a studio brand to meet reader demand. Naoki Urasawa, Takao Saito, Kaiji Kawaguchi are all like that. You expand the factory to meet all those new sales orders.
What's less understandable is the artists doing mediocre work in a magazine that sells a few tens of thousands a month (quite good in American comics, not so impressive in manga) who are still using five or six assistants. In other words, not only is the reader demand not there, but it's not obvious the work is any better for its support staff. It's, like "couldn't you have done *that* by yourself?"
It may be that, just as anime spreads itself too thin, making more series than it actually has the resources or talent to do well (Noboru Ishiguro raised this issue as early as 1996), manga is the same way. The downside of something I tremendously admire--the thick anthology manga magazine, which I rank with the LP or VHS tape as a revolutionary media format--may be that it encourages a mentality of "we've got to fill these 600 pages up," regardless of whether the talent is there, and it supports genuinely weak (not just experimental or unpopular) titles that could never have made it on their own.
Posted by: Carl | November 14, 2009 at 06:55 AM
Speaking of "revolutionary media format", I think keitai culture is killing print manga, along with every other form of media. We're 18 to 24 months away from Clarke's 2001 Newspad; after that, the age of paper-based mass media is over.
As for the dearth of good manga stories, I don't believe it. NODAME CANTIBILE is as good or better than the best manga of the classic age. PLUTO, MONSTER, and 20TH CENTURY BOYS are absolutely fantastic. And there's still plenty of decent lighter fare like K-ON! out there. I think Big Manga )for lack of a better term) is just upset because the BEYBLADE fad is over.
Posted by: Bruce Lewis | November 14, 2009 at 12:04 PM
"American comics creators sometimes scratch their head when they hear of the crew of assistants a manga artist uses--a U.S. comics artist is expected to create everything on a page themselves."
Is this strictly true? I'd thought there were pencillers, inkers, colorists, letterers. It's my sense that most manga-ka hire assistants out of a sense of survival -- particularly those churning out weekly content, which can be a serious grind even if you happen to be god's gift to the medium.
"My question is, what's changing the stream? "
This is my take: back "in the day" manga were one of only a handful of entertainment media that were cheap and readily accessible to pretty much every demographic. Now they're competing with more and varied media, video games in particular.
I also think that while there is definitely great content to be found out there, the overall quality level as a whole is in decline. You just aren't seeing the variety of genre hits like you used to. Naoki Urasawa pretty much singlehandedly seems to own the mainstream these days. I think this is what the original article is getting at when they say what sells sells and what doesn't doesn't; the middle ground seems to be rapidly shrinking.
Posted by: MattAlt | November 15, 2009 at 07:11 AM
Bruce is hitting on the 'print is dead' thing (and I know he doesn't WANT that, it's just a conclusion) and I still disagree. Japan doesn't seem to have undergone the massive inflation of cheap, disposable entertainment the way we in the U.S. have. A 600 page weekly 'phonebook' manga mag is STILL around 300 Yen, which is what it was as far back as I was buying this crap. As far as I am aware (and please, correct me!) they never underwent all the things that have pretty much killed the Americomi industry-shutting down newsstand distro in favor of the direct market, the war between distributors resulting in a monopoly in distro; the experiments to bump up profit margin by decreasing page count, switching manufacturing tech (remember the first years of flexi printing plates?) and then moving printing from the U.S to Canada, playing with paper stock quality, perfect binding vs. saddlestich, variant covers, killing long run titles to 're-invent' the title as a series of 6 issue miniseries,cutting ads and raising prices, raising prices...Japan did none of these things.
The reason why print magazines won't die in Japan is because there's a LOT of people employed by the complicated distro system (where something like 6 'hands' touch the product before it gets to the final retailer), they'll run the biz into the ground first rather than risk streamlining that system and making it cheaper.
I dunno. Handheld 'readers' are going to have to get much better with full color, thinner and lighter and insane battery life, as well as affordable, cheap content. Since half (maybe 2/3!) of that 300 Yen Phonebook manga mag is paying for the profit of the retailer and the entire distro network the digital version SHOULD sell for 100 Yen which WOULD be a powerful incentive, but we all know it won't go that way.
bah. I have no good answers.
Posted by: Steve Harrison | November 15, 2009 at 11:05 AM
This is sad, sad news indeed :(
Posted by: Hirobot | November 15, 2009 at 04:24 PM
When the Clarke-tech Newspad arrives, it won't be anything like a Kindle or a tablet computer. It will be a paper-thin computer/full-color display that is self-powered, lightweight, foldable, cheap, and disposable. People will buy them in pads of 500, like buying Post-It® notes, and throw them away when they become worn, soiled, or incapable of receiving or displaying wireless content.
As I said: 18-24 months until the first prototypes; in common use by Doomsday 2012
Posted by: Bruce Lewis | November 15, 2009 at 05:25 PM
Dear Matt,
I should have spoken a bit more precisely ^_^ What I meant was, you often hear that the credited artist of a manga series is actually only blocking out the page layouts and drawing the main characters, or perhaps even the main characters' faces. An American comics artist is traditionally expected to pencil (or at least render) everything, including minor characters and backgrounds.
Many U.S. comics are inked, but it is not quite as common in American color comics as it once was; it's seen today as more of a style (giving a certain desired emphasis or tone to the linework) than a professional necessity. That is, while any comic series hoping to compete for high sales is still expected to be in color, the inking stage can now be foregone. By no means has the tradition of the skilled inker, bringing a personal style to a book, been abandoned. But in many cases now, the pencils are simply scanned and then colored without an inking stage. This is also possible because coloring methods are much more sophisticated and exact than they once were.
Posted by: Carl | November 17, 2009 at 12:58 PM
(B/W U.S. comics are another matter, but even they can now be accepted as a pencil-only style; EMPOWERED and MEGATOKYO are two examples).
I have seen manga-ka, though, who, as far as I can tell, are only doing 22 pages a month of pro work, who nevertheless credit five or six assistants to produce something a pro American artist could do either by themselves, or with one collaborator, an inker. It would be interesting to know what percentage of manga-ka have manga as their sole source of income.
Class issues come into it like everything else. I know one manga artist who comes from a wealthy family; basically, their parents are still paying all their bills. There are others who have some mix of family support, part-time (or full-time) jobs, supplemental income through doujinshi, etc. If a person only has a limited number of hours they can devote to making manga per week, the assistant system might be more logical.
Posted by: Carl | November 17, 2009 at 12:59 PM
that I love comic/manga
Posted by: Anime Lovers | October 29, 2010 at 07:56 AM
Does anyone know if they sell their original pages like American comic artists do?
Posted by: anon | June 01, 2011 at 08:19 AM